William Tecumseh Sherman (February 8, 1820 – February 14, 1891)
was an American soldier, businessman, educator, and author. He
served as a general in the United States Army during the
American Civil War (1861–65), receiving both recognition for his
outstanding command of military strategy, and criticism for the
harshness of the "scorched earth" policies he implemented in
conducting total war against the enemy. Military historian Basil
Liddell Hart famously declared that Sherman was "the first
modern general."[1]
Sherman served under General Ulysses S. Grant in 1862 and 1863
during the campaigns that led to the fall of the Confederate
stronghold of Vicksburg on the Mississippi River and culminated
with the routing of the Confederate armies in the state of
Tennessee. In 1864, Sherman succeeded Grant as the Union
commander in the western theater of the war. He proceeded to
lead his troops to the capture of the city of Atlanta, a
military success that contributed decisively to the re-election
of President Abraham Lincoln. Sherman's subsequent march through
Georgia and the Carolinas further undermined the Confederacy's
ability to continue fighting. He accepted the surrender of all
the Confederate armies in the Carolinas, Georgia, and Florida in
April 1865.
After the Civil War, Sherman became Commanding General of the
Army (1869–83). As such, he was responsible for the conduct of
the Indian Wars in the western United States. He steadfastly
refused to be drawn into politics and in 1875 published his
Memoirs, one of the best-known firsthand accounts of the Civil
War.
****
Nickname: Cump, Uncle Billy
Place of birth: Lancaster, Ohio
Place of death: New York City, New York
Allegiance: United States of America
Years of service: 1840–84
Rank: Major General (Civil War),
Commanding General of the United States Army (postbellum)
Commands: Army of the Tennessee (1863),
Military Division of the Mississippi (1864)
Battles/wars: Shiloh, Vicksburg Campaign, Chattanooga, Atlanta
Campaign, March to the Sea, Carolinas Campaign
Awards: Thanks of Congress (1864 and 1865)
Other work: Bank president, lawyer, university superintendent,
streetcar executive
****
Early life
Sherman was born in Lancaster, Ohio, near the shores of the
Hockhocking River (now the Hocking). He was named Tecumseh after
the famous Shawnee leader. His father, Charles Robert Sherman,
was a successful lawyer who sat on the Ohio Supreme Court. Judge
Sherman died unexpectedly in 1829, leaving his widow, Mary Hoyt
Sherman, with eleven children and no inheritance. Following this
tragedy the nine-year-old Tecumseh was taken in and raised by a
Lancaster neighbor and family friend, attorney Thomas Ewing, a
prominent member of the Whig Party who served as Senator for
Ohio and as the first Secretary of the Interior.
Ewing's wife, Maria, insisted that Sherman be baptized Roman
Catholic. On that occasion a Dominican priest bestowed upon him
the name of William (chosen because the baptism occurred on June
25, the feast day of Saint William of Vercelli). Sherman's own
family was Episcopalian, and he never became a devout
Catholic.[2] He also never completely accepted the name
"William" and friends and family always called him "Cump."[3]
One of his younger brothers, John Sherman, would become a U.S.
Senator and the sponsor of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Military training
and service
Senator Ewing secured the appointment of the 16-year-old Sherman
as a cadet in the United States Military Academy at West
Point.[4] There Sherman excelled academically but treated the
demerit system with indifference. Fellow cadet William Rosecrans
would later remember Sherman at West Point as "one of the
brightest and most popular fellows," and "a bright-eyed,
red-headed fellow, who was always prepared for a lark of any
kind."[5] About his time at West Point, Sherman says only the
following in his Memoirs:
At
the Academy I was not considered a good soldier, for at no time
was I selected for any office, but remained a private throughout
the whole four years. Then, as now, neatness in dress and form,
with a strict conformity to the rules, were the qualifications
required for office, and I suppose I was found not to excel in
any of these. In studies I always held a respectable reputation
with the professors, and generally ranked among the best,
especially in drawing, chemistry, mathematics, and natural
philosophy. My average demerits, per annum, were about one
hundred and fifty, which reduced my final class standing from
number four to six.[6]
Upon graduation in 1840, Sherman entered the Army as a second
lieutenant in the 3rd U.S. Artillery and saw action in Florida
in the Second Seminole War against the Seminole tribe. He was
later stationed in Georgia and South Carolina. As the foster son
of a prominent Whig politician, in Charleston the popular Lt.
Sherman moved within the upper circles of the Old South
society.[7]
While many of his colleagues saw action in the Mexican War,
Sherman performed administrative duties in the captured
territory of California. He and fellow officer Lt. Edward Ord
reached the town of Yerba Buena two days before its name was
changed to San Francisco. In 1848, Sherman accompanied the
military governor of California, Col. Richard Barnes Mason, in
the inspection that officially confirmed the claim that gold had
been discovered in the region, thus inaugurating the California
Gold Rush.[8] Sherman earned a brevet promotion to captain for
his "meritorious service," but his lack of a combat assignment
discouraged him and may have contributed to his decision to
resign his commission. Sherman would become one of the
relatively few high-ranking officers in the Civil War who had
not fought in Mexico.
Marriage and
business career
In
1850 Sherman married Thomas Ewing's daughter Eleanor Boyle
("Ellen") Ewing. Ellen was a devout Catholic and the Shermans'
eight children were raised in that faith. To Sherman's great
displeasure and sorrow, one of his sons, Thomas Ewing Sherman,
was ordained as a Jesuit priest in 1879. Thomas would preside
over his father's funeral mass in 1891.[9]
In
1853, Sherman resigned his military commission and became
president of a bank in San Francisco. He returned to San
Francisco at a time of great turmoil in the West. He survived
two shipwrecks and floated through the Golden Gate on the scraps
of a foundering lumber schooner.[10] Sherman eventually found
himself suffering from stress-related asthma due to the city's
brutal financial climate.[11] Late in life, regarding his time
in real estate speculation-mad San Francisco, Sherman recalled:
"I can handle a hundred thousand men in battle, and take the
City of the Sun, but am afraid to manage a lot in the swamp of
San Francisco."[12] In 1856 he served as a major general of the
California militia.
Sherman's bank failed during the financial panic of 1857 and he
turned to the practice of law in Leavenworth, Kansas, at which
he was also unsuccessful.[13]
University
superintendent
In
1859 Sherman accepted a job as the first superintendent of the
Louisiana State Seminary of Learning and Military Academy in
Pineville, a position offered to him by two of his Army friends
from the South: P.G.T. Beauregard and Braxton Bragg.[14] He
proved an effective and popular leader of that institution,
which would later become Louisiana State University. Col. Joseph
P. Taylor, the brother of the late President Zachary Taylor,
declared that "if you had hunted the whole army, from one end of
it to the other, you could not have found a man in it more
admirably suited for the position in every respect than
Sherman."[15]
On
hearing of South Carolina's secession from the United States,
Sherman observed to a close friend, Prof. David F. Boyd of
Virginia:
You
people of the South don't know what you are doing. This country
will be drenched in blood, and God only knows how it will end.
It is all folly, madness, a crime against civilization! You
people speak so lightly of war; you don't know what you're
talking about. War is a terrible thing!
You
mistake, too, the people of the North. They are a peaceable
people but an earnest people, and they will fight, too. They are
not going to let this country be destroyed without a mighty
effort to save it ...
Besides, where are your men and appliances of war to contend
against them? The North can make a steam engine, locomotive, or
railway car; hardly a yard of cloth or pair of shoes can you
make. You are rushing into war with one of the most powerful,
ingeniously mechanical, and determined people on Earth—right at
your doors.
You
are bound to fail. Only in your spirit and determination are you
prepared for war. In all else you are totally unprepared, with a
bad cause to start with. At first you will make headway, but as
your limited resources begin to fail, shut out from the markets
of Europe as you will be, your cause will begin to wane. If your
people will but stop and think, they must see in the end that
you will surely fail.[16]
In
January 1861 just before the outbreak of the American Civil War,
Sherman was required to accept receipt of arms surrendered to
the State Militia by the U.S. Arsenal at Baton Rouge. Instead of
complying, he resigned his position as superintendent and
returned to the North, declaring to the governor of Louisiana,
"On no earthly account will I do any act or think any thought
hostile ... to the ... United States."[17] He became president
of the St. Louis Railroad, a streetcar company, a position he
held for only a few months before being called to Washington,
D.C.
Civil War service
Army commission
Sherman accepted a commission as a colonel in the 13th U.S.
Infantry regiment on May 14, 1861. He was one of the few Union
officers to distinguish himself at the First Battle of Bull Run
on July 21, where he was grazed by bullets in the knee and
shoulder. The disastrous Union defeat led Sherman to question
his own judgment as an officer and the capacities of his troops,
but President Abraham Lincoln promoted him to brigadier general
of volunteers (effective May 17, which gave him more senior rank
than that of Ulysses S. Grant, his future commander).[18] He was
assigned to command the Department of the Cumberland in
Louisville, Kentucky.
Breakdown and Shiloh
During his time in Louisville, Sherman became increasingly
pessimistic about the outlook of the war and repeatedly made
estimates of the strength of the rebel forces that proved
exaggerated, causing the local press to describe him as "crazy."
In the fall of 1861, Sherman experienced what would probably be
described today as a nervous breakdown. He was put on leave and
returned to Ohio to recuperate, being replaced in his command by
Don Carlos Buell. While he was at home, his wife, Ellen, wrote
to his brother Senator John Sherman seeking advice and
complaining of "that melancholy insanity to which your family is
subject."[19] However, Sherman quickly recovered and returned to
service under Maj. Gen. Henry W. Halleck, commander of the
Department of the Missouri. Halleck's department had just won a
major victory at Fort Henry, but he harbored doubts about the
commander in the field, Brig. Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, and his
plans to capture Fort Donelson. Unbeknownst to Grant, Halleck
offered several officers, including Sherman, command of Grant's
army. Sherman refused, saying he preferred serving under Grant,
even though he outranked him. Sherman wrote to Grant from
Paducah, "Command me in any way. I feel anxious about you as I
know the great facilities [the Confederates] have of
concentration by means of the river and railroad, but [I] have
faith in you."[20]
After Grant was promoted to major general in command of the
District of West Tennessee, Sherman served briefly as his
replacement in command of the District of Cairo. He got his wish
of serving under Grant when he was assigned on March 1, 1862 to
the Army of West Tennessee as commander of the 5th Division.[21]
His first major test under Grant was at the Battle of Shiloh.
The massive Confederate attack on the morning of April 6 took
most of the senior Union commanders by surprise. Sherman in
particular had dismissed the intelligence reports that he had
received from militia officers, refusing to believe that
Confederate General Albert Sidney Johnston would leave his base
at Corinth. He took no precautions beyond strengthening his
picket lines, refusing to entrench, build abatis, or push out
reconnaissance patrols. At Shiloh he may have wished to avoid
appearing overly alarmed in order to escape the kind of
criticism he had received in Kentucky. He had written to his
wife that, if he took more precautions, "they'd call me crazy
again."[22]
Despite being caught unprepared by the attack, Sherman rallied
his division and conducted an orderly, fighting retreat that
helped prevent a disastrous Union rout. Finding Grant at the end
of the day sitting under an oak tree in the darkness smoking a
cigar, he experienced, in his own words "some wise and sudden
instinct not to mention retreat." Instead, in what would become
one of the most famous conversations of the war, Sherman said
simply: "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't
we?" After a puff of his cigar Grant replied calmly: "Yes. Lick
'em tomorrow, though."[23] Sherman would prove instrumental to
the successful Union counterattack of April 7. At Shiloh,
Sherman was wounded twice —in the hand and shoulder— and had
three horses shot out from under him. His performance was
praised by Grant and Halleck and after the battle he was
promoted to major general of volunteers, effective May 1.[24]
Vicksburg and
Chattanooga
Sherman developed close personal ties to Grant during the two
years they served together. Shortly after Shiloh, Sherman
persuaded Grant not to resign from the Army, despite the serious
difficulties he was having with his commander, General Halleck.
Sherman offered Grant an example from his own life, "Before the
battle of Shiloh, I was cast down by a mere newspaper assertion
of 'crazy', but that single battle gave me new life, and I'm now
in high feather." He told Grant that, if he remained in the
army, "some happy accident might restore you to favor and your
true place."[25] The careers of both officers ascended
considerably after that time.
Sherman's military record in 1862–63 was mixed. In December 1862
forces under his command suffered a severe repulse at the Battle
of Chickasaw Bluffs, just north of Vicksburg. Soon after, his XV
Corps was ordered to join Maj. Gen. John A. McClernand in his
successful assault on Arkansas Post, generally regarded as a
politically motivated distraction from the effort to capture
Vicksburg.[26] Before the Vicksburg Campaign in the spring of
1863, Sherman expressed serious reservations about the wisdom of
Grant's unorthodox strategy[27], but he went on to perform well
in that campaign under Grant's supervision.
During the Battle of Chattanooga in November, Sherman, now in
command of the Army of the Tennessee, quickly took his assigned
target of Billy Goat Hill at the north end of Missionary Ridge,
only to discover that it was not part of the ridge at all, but
rather a detached spur separated from the main spine by a
rock-strewn ravine. When he attempted to attack the main spine
at Tunnel Hill, his troops were repeatedly repulsed by Patrick
Cleburne's heavy division, the best unit in Braxton Bragg's
army.[28] Sherman's effort was overshadowed by George Henry
Thomas's army's successful assault on the center of the
Confederate line, a movement originally intended as a diversion.
Despite this mixed record, Sherman enjoyed Grant's confidence
and friendship. In later years Sherman said simply, "Grant stood
by me when I was crazy, and I stood by him when he was drunk.
Now we stand by each other always."[29]
Georgia
When Lincoln called Grant east in the spring of 1864 to take
command of all the Union armies, Grant appointed Sherman (by
then known to his soldiers as "Uncle Billy") to succeed him as
head of the Military Division of the Mississippi, which entailed
command of Union troops in the Western Theater of the war.
Sherman proceeded to invade the state of Georgia with three
armies: the 60,000-strong Army of the Cumberland under George
Henry Thomas, the 25,000-strong Army of the Tennessee under
James B. McPherson, and the 13,000-strong Army of the Ohio under
John M. Schofield.[30] He fought a lengthy campaign of maneuver
through mountainous terrain against Confederate General Joseph
E. Johnston's Army of Tennessee, attempting a direct assault
against Johnston only at the disastrous Battle of Kennesaw
Mountain. The cautious Johnston was replaced by the more
aggressive John Bell Hood, who played to Sherman's strength by
challenging him to direct battles on open ground.
Sherman's Atlanta Campaign concluded successfully on September
2, 1864, with the capture of the city of Atlanta, an
accomplishment that made Sherman a household name in the North
and helped ensure Lincoln's presidential re-election in
November. Lincoln's electoral defeat by Democratic Party
candidate George B. McClellan, the former Union army commander,
had appeared likely in the summer of that year. Such an outcome
would probably have meant the victory of the Confederacy, as the
Democratic Party platform called for peace negotiations based on
the acknowledgement of the Confederacy's independence. Thus the
capture of Atlanta, coming when it did, may have been Sherman's
greatest contribution to the Union cause.
After Atlanta, Sherman coolly dismissed the impact of Gen.
Hood's attacks against his supply lines and sent George Thomas
to defeat him in the Franklin-Nashville Campaign. Meanwhile,
declaring that he could "make Georgia howl"[31], Sherman marched
with 62,000 men to the port of Savannah, living off the land and
causing, by his own estimate, more than $100 million in property
damage.[32] At the end of this campaign, known as Sherman's
March to the Sea, his troops captured Savannah on December 22.
Sherman then telegraphed Lincoln, offering him the city as a
Christmas present.
Sherman's success in Georgia received ample coverage in the
Northern press at a time when Grant seemed to be making little
progress in his fight against Confederate General Robert E.
Lee's Army of Northern Virginia. A bill was introduced in
Congress to promote Sherman to Grant's rank of lieutenant
general, probably with a view towards having him replace Grant
as commander of the Union Army. Sherman wrote both to his
brother, Senator John Sherman, and to General Grant vehemently
repudiating any such promotion.[33]
The Carolinas
In
the spring of 1865, Grant ordered Sherman to embark his army on
steamers to join him against Lee in Virginia. Instead, Sherman
persuaded Grant to allow him to march north through the
Carolinas, destroying everything of military value along the
way, as he had done in Georgia. He was particularly interested
in targeting South Carolina, the first state to secede from the
Union, for the effect it would have on Southern morale. His army
proceeded north through South Carolina against light resistance
from the troops of Confederate General Joseph E. Johnston. Upon
hearing that Sherman's men were advancing on corduroy roads
through the Salkehatchie swamps at a rate of a dozen miles per
day, Johnston declared that "there had been no such army in
existence since the days of Julius Caesar."[34]
Sherman captured the state capital of Columbia on February 17,
1865. Fires began that night and by next morning most of the
central city was destroyed. The burning of Columbia has
engendered controversy ever since, with some claiming the fires
were accidental, others a deliberate act of vengeance, and
others that the fires started when retreating Confederates
burned bales of cotton on their way out of town. Sherman
proceeded to march through North Carolina, where his troops did
little damage to the civilian infrastructure.
Shortly after his victory over Johnston's troops at the Battle
of Bentonville, Sherman met with Johnston at Bennett Place in
Durham, North Carolina, to negotiate a Confederate surrender. At
the insistence of Johnston and Confederate President Jefferson
Davis, Sherman offered terms that dealt with both political and
military issues, despite having no authorization to do so from
General Grant or the United States government. The government in
Washington, D.C., refused to honor the terms agreed to by
Sherman and Johnston, a circumstance that precipitated a
long-lasting feud between Sherman and Secretary of War Edwin M.
Stanton. Confusion over this issue lasted until April 26, when
Johnston, ignoring instructions from President Davis, agreed to
purely military terms and formally surrendered his army and all
the Confederate forces in the Carolinas, Georgia, and
Florida.[35]
Slavery and
emancipation
Though he came to disapprove of chattel slavery, Sherman was not
an abolitionist before the war, and like many of his time and
background, he did not believe in "Negro equality."[36] His
military campaigns of 1864 and 1865 freed many slaves, who
greeted him "as a second Moses or Aaron"[37] and joined his
marches through Georgia and the Carolinas by the tens of
thousands. The precarious living conditions and uncertain future
of the freed slaves quickly became a pressing issue.
On
January 12, 1865, Sherman met in Savannah with Secretary of War
Stanton and with twenty local black leaders. After Sherman's
departure, Garrison Frazier, a Baptist minister, declared in
response to an inquiry about the feelings of the black community
that
We
looked upon General Sherman, prior to his arrival, as a man, in
the providence of God, specially set apart to accomplish this
work, and we unanimously felt inexpressible gratitude to him,
looking upon him as a man that should be honored for the
faithful performance of his duty. Some of us called upon him
immediately upon his arrival, and it is probable he did not meet
[Secretary Stanton] with more courtesy than he met us. His
conduct and deportment toward us characterized him as a friend
and a gentleman.[38]
Four days later, Sherman issued his Special Field Orders, No.
15. The orders provided for the settlement of 40,000 freed
slaves and black refugees on land expropriated from white
landowners in South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida. Sherman
appointed Brig. Gen. Rufus Saxton, an abolitionist from
Massachusetts who had previously directed the recruitment of
black soldiers, to implement that plan.[39] Those orders, which
became the basis of the claim that the Union government had
promised freed slaves "40 acres and a mule," were revoked later
that year by President Andrew Johnson.
Strategies
General Sherman's record as a tactician was mixed, and his
military legacy rests primarily on his command of logistics and
on his brilliance as a strategist. The influential 20th century
British military historian and theorist Basil Liddell Hart
ranked Sherman as one of the most important strategists in the
annals of war, along with Scipio Africanus, Belisarius, Napoleon
Bonaparte, T.E. Lawrence, and Erwin Rommel. Liddell Hart
credited Sherman with mastery of maneuver warfare (also known as
the "indirect approach"), as demonstrated by his series of
turning movements against Johnston during the Atlanta Campaign.
Liddell Hart also stated that study of Sherman's campaigns had
contributed significantly to his own "theory of strategy and
tactics in mechanized warfare," which had in turn influenced
Heinz Guderian's doctrine of Blitzkrieg and Rommel's use of
tanks during World War II.[40]
Sherman's greatest contribution to the war, the strategy of
total warfare—endorsed by General Grant and President
Lincoln—has been the subject of much controversy. Sherman
himself downplayed his role in conducting total war, often
saying that he was simply carrying out orders as best he could
in order to fulfill his part of Grant's master plan for ending
the war.
Total warfare
Like Grant, Sherman was convinced that the Confederacy's
strategic, economic, and psychological ability to wage further
war had to be definitively crushed if the fighting were to end.
Therefore, he believed that the North had to conduct its
campaign as a war of conquest and employ scorched earth tactics
to break the backbone of the rebellion.
Sherman's advance through Georgia and South Carolina was
characterized by widespread destruction of civilian supplies and
infrastructure, and sometimes accompanied by looting; although
officially forbidden, historians disagree on how well this
regulation was enforced.[41] The speed and efficiency of the
destruction by Sherman's army was remarkable. The practice of
bending rails around trees, leaving behind what came to be known
as Sherman's neckties, made repairs difficult. Accusations that
civilians were targeted and war crimes were committed on the
march have made Sherman a controversial figure to this day,
particularly in the South.
The
damage done by Sherman was almost entirely limited to the
destruction of property. Though exact figures are not available,
the loss of civilian life appears to have been very small.[42]
Consuming supplies, wrecking infrastructure, and undermining
morale were Sherman's stated goals, and several of his Southern
contemporaries noted this and commented on it. For instance,
Alabama-born Major Henry Hitchcock, who served in Sherman's
staff, declared that "it is a terrible thing to consume and
destroy the sustenance of thousands of people," but if the
scorched earth strategy served "to paralyze their husbands and
fathers who are fighting ... it is mercy in the end."[43]
The
severity of the destructive acts by Union troops was
significantly greater in South Carolina than in Georgia or North
Carolina. This appears to have been a consequence of the
animosity among both Union soldiers and officers to the state
that they regarded as the "cockpit of secession."[44] One of the
most serious accusations against Sherman was that he allowed his
troops to burn the city of Columbia. Historian James M.
McPherson, however, claims that:
The
fullest and most dispassionate study of this controversy blames
all parties in varying proportions—including the Confederate
authorities for the disorder that characterized the evacuation
of Columbia, leaving thousands of cotton bales on the streets
(some of them burning) and huge quantities of liquor undestroyed
... Sherman did not deliberately burn Columbia; a majority of
Union soldiers, including the general himself, worked through
the night to put out the fires.[45]
Modern assessment
After the fall of Atlanta in 1864, Sherman ordered the city's
evacuation. When the city council appealed to him to rescind
that order, on the grounds that it would cause great hardship to
women, children, the elderly, and others who bore no
responsibility for the conduct of the war, Sherman sent a
response in which he sought to articulate his conviction that a
lasting peace would be possible only if the Union were restored,
and that he was therefore prepared to do all he could
legitimately do to quash the rebellion:
You
cannot qualify war in harsher terms than I will. War is cruelty,
and you cannot refine it; and those who brought war into our
country deserve all the curses and maledictions a people can
pour out. I know I had no hand in making this war, and I know I
will make more sacrifices to-day than any of you to secure
peace. But you cannot have peace and a division of our country.
If the United States submits to a division now, it will not
stop, but will go on until we reap the fate of Mexico, which is
eternal war.
[...] I want peace, and believe it can only be reached through
union and war, and I will ever conduct war with a view to
perfect and early success.
But, my dear sirs, when peace does come, you may call on me for
anything. Then will I share with you the last cracker, and watch
with you to shield your homes and families against danger from
every quarter.[46]
Literary critic Edmund Wilson found in Sherman's Memoirs a
fascinating and disturbing account of an "appetite for warfare"
that "grows as it feeds on the South."[47] Former U.S. Defense
Secretary Robert McNamara refers equivocally to the statement
that "war is cruelty and you cannot refine it" in both the book
Wilson's Ghost[48] and in his interview for the film The Fog of
War. Some modern sympathizers of the Confederate cause have
denounced Sherman's attitude as proto-totalitarian and as a
harbinger of the inhumanity of the large-scale wars of the 20th
century.[49]
On
the other hand, when comparing Sherman's scorched earth
campaigns to the actions of the British Army during the Second
Boer War (1899-1902) —another war in which civilians were
targeted because of their central role in sustaining an armed
resistance— South African historian Hermann Giliomee declares
that it "looks as if Sherman struck a better balance than the
British commanders between severity and restraint in taking
actions proportional to legitimate needs."[50] The admiration of
scholars such as Victor Davis Hanson, Basil Liddell Hart, Lloyd
Lewis, and John F. Marszalek for General Sherman owes much to
what they see as an approach to the exigencies of modern armed
conflict that was both effective and principled.
Postbellum service
In
May 1865, after the major Confederate armies had surrendered,
Sherman wrote in a personal letter:
I
confess, without shame, that I am sick and tired of fighting—its
glory is all moonshine; even success the most brilliant is over
dead and mangled bodies, with the anguish and lamentations of
distant families, appealing to me for sons, husbands, and
fathers ... it is only those who have never heard a shot, never
heard the shriek and groans of the wounded and lacerated ...
that cry aloud for more blood, more vengeance, more
desolation.[51]
On
July 25, 1866, Congress created the rank of general of the army
for Grant and promoted Sherman to lieutenant general. When Grant
became president in 1869, Sherman was appointed commanding
general of the U.S. Army. After the death of John A. Rawlins,
Sherman also served for one month as interim Secretary of War.
His tenure as commanding general was marred by political
difficulties, and from 1874 to 1876, he moved his headquarters
to St. Louis in an attempt to escape from them. One of his
significant contributions as head of the Army was the
establishment of the Command School (now the Command and General
Staff College) at Fort Leavenworth.
Sherman's main concern as commanding general was to protect the
construction and operation of the railroads from attack by
hostile Indians. In his campaigns against the Indian tribes,
Sherman repeated his Civil War strategy by seeking not only to
defeat the enemy's soldiers, but also to destroy the resources
that allowed the enemy to sustain its warfare. The policies he
implemented included the decimation of the buffalo, which were
the primary source of food for the Plains Indians.[52] Despite
his harsh treatment of the warring tribes, Sherman spoke out
against speculators and government agents who treated the
natives unfairly within the reservations.[53]
In
1875 Sherman published his memoirs in two volumes. According to
critic Edmund Wilson, Sherman
had
a trained gift of self-expression and was, as Mark Twain says, a
master of narrative. [In his Memoirs] the vigorous account of
his pre-war activities and his conduct of his military
operations is varied in just the right proportion and to just
the right degree of vivacity with anecdotes and personal
experiences. We live through his campaigns [...] in the company
of Sherman himself. He tells us what he thought and what he
felt, and he never strikes any attitudes or pretends to feel
anything he does not feel.[54]
In
June 19, 1879, Sherman delivered his famous "War Is Hell" speech
to the graduating class of the Michigan Military Academy and to
the gathered crowd of more than 10,000:
There is many a boy here today who looks on war as all glory,
but, boys, it is all hell.[55]
Sherman stepped down as commanding general on November 1, 1883
and retired from the army on February 8, 1884. He lived most of
the rest of his life in New York City. He was devoted to the
theater and to amateur painting and was much in demand as a
colorful speaker at dinners and banquets, in which he indulged a
fondness for quoting Shakespeare.[56] Sherman was proposed as a
Republican candidate for the presidential election of 1884, but
declined as emphatically as possible, saying, "If nominated I
will not run; if elected I will not serve." Such a categorical
rejection of a candidacy is now referred to as a "Sherman
Statement."
Death and posterity
Sherman died in New York City. On February 19, 1891, a small
funeral was held there at his home. His body was then
transported to St. Louis, where another service was conducted on
February 21 at a local Catholic church. General Joseph E.
Johnston, the Confederate officer who had commanded the
resistance to Sherman's troops in Georgia and the Carolinas,
served as a pallbearer. It was a bitterly cold day and a friend
of Johnston, fearing that the general might become ill, asked
him to put on his hat. Johnston famously replied: "If I were in
[Sherman's] place, and he were standing in mine, he would not
put on his hat." Johnston did catch a serious cold and died one
month later of pneumonia.[57]
Sherman is buried in Calvary Cemetery in St. Louis. Major
memorials to Sherman include the gilded bronze equestrian statue
by Augustus Saint-Gaudens at the main entrance to Central Park
in New York City and the major monument by Carl Rohl-Smith near
President's Park in Washington, D.C. Other posthumous tributes
include the naming of the World War II M4 Sherman tank and the
"General Sherman" Giant Sequoia tree, the most massive
documented single trunk tree in the world.
Some of the artistic treatments of Sherman's march are the Civil
War era song "Marching Through Georgia" by Henry Clay Work, the
film Sherman's March by Ross McElwee, and E.L. Doctorow's novel
The March.
Writings
General Sherman's Official Account of His Great March to Georgia
and the Carolinas, from His Departure from Chattanooga to the
Surrender of General Joseph E. Johnston and Confederate Forces
under His Command (1865)
Memoirs of General William T. Sherman, Written by Himself (1875)
Reports of Inspection Made in the Summer of 1877 by Generals P.
H. Sheridan and W. T. Sherman of Country North of the Union
Pacific Railroad (co-author, 1878)
The
Sherman Letters: Correspondence between General and Senator
Sherman from 1837 to 1891 (posthumous, 1894)
Home Letters of General Sherman (posthumous, 1909)
General W. T. Sherman as College President: A Collection of
Letters, Documents, and Other Material, Chiefly from Private
Sources, Relating to the Life and Activities of General William
Tecumseh Sherman, to the Early Years of Louisiana State
University, and the Stirring Conditions Existing in the South on
the Eve of the Civil War (posthumous, 1912)
The
William Tecumseh Sherman Family Letters (posthumous, 1967)
Sherman at War (posthumous, 1992)
Sherman's Civil War: Selected Correspondence of William T.
Sherman, 1860 – 1865 (posthumous, 1999)
References
Brockett, L.P., Our Great Captains: Grant, Sherman, Thomas,
Sheridan, and Farragut, C.B. Richardson, 1866.
Daniel, Larry J., Shiloh: The Battle That Changed the Civil War,
Simon & Schuster, 1997, ISBN 0-684-80375-5.
Eicher, John H., & Eicher, David J., Civil War High Commands,
Stanford University Press, 2001, ISBN 0-8047-3641-3.
Giliomee, Hermann, The Afrikaners: Biography of a People,
University Press of Virginia, 2003, ISBN 0-8139-2237-2.
Grimsley, Mark, The Hard Hand of War: Union Military Policy
toward Southern Civilians, 1861-1865, Cambridge University
Press, 1997, ISBN 0-5215-9941-5.
Hanson, Victor D., The Soul of Battle, Anchor Books, 1999, ISBN
0-3857-2059-9.
Hirshson, Stanley P., The White Tecumseh: A Biography of General
William T. Sherman, John Wiley & Sons, 1997, ISBN 0-4712-8329-0.
Hitchcock, Henry, Marching with Sherman: Passages from the
Letters and Campaign Diaries of Henry Hitchcock, Major and
Assistant Adjutant General of Volunteers, November 1864 – May
1865, ed. M.A. DeWolfe Howe, Yale University Press, 1927.
Reprinted in 1995 by the University of Nebraska Press, ISBN
0-8032-7276-6.
Isenberg, Andrew C., The Destruction of the Bison, Cambridge
University Press, 2000, ISBN 0-5210-0348-2.
Lewis, Lloyd, Sherman: Fighting Prophet, Harcourt, Brace & Co.,
1932. Reprinted in 1993 by the University of Nebraska Press,
ISBN 0-8032-7945-0.
Liddell Hart, Basil Henry, Sherman: Soldier, Realist, American,
Dodd, Mead & Co., 1929. Reprinted in 1993 by Da Capo Press, ISBN
0-3068-0507-3.
Marszalek, John, Sherman: A Soldier's Passion for Order, Free
Press, 1992, ISBN 0-0292-0135-7.
McNamara, Robert S. and Blight, James G., Wilson's Ghost:
Reducing the Risk of Conflict, Killing, and Catastrophe in the
21st Century, Public Affairs, 2001, ISBN 1-8916-2089-4.
McPherson, James M., Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era,
illustrated ed., Oxford University Press, 2003, ISBN
0-1951-5091-2.
Royster, Charles, The Destructive War: William Tecumseh Sherman,
Stonewall Jackson, and the Americans, Alfred A. Knopf, 1991,
ISBN 0-6797-3878-9.
Sherman's Civil War: Selected Correspondence of William T.
Sherman,1860-1865, eds. B.D. Simpson and J.V. Berlin, University
of North Carolina Press, 1999, ISBN 0-8078-2440-2.
Sherman, William T., Memoirs of General W.T. Sherman, 2nd ed.,
D. Appleton & Co., 1913 (1889). Reprinted by the Library of
America, 1990, ISBN 0-9404-5065-8.
Smith, Jean Edward, Grant, Simon and Shuster, 2001, ISBN
0-684-84927-5.
Walsh, George, Whip the Rebellion, Forge Books, 2005, ISBN
0-7653-0526-7.
Warner, Ezra J., Generals in Blue: Lives of the Union
Commanders, Louisiana State University Press, 1964, ISBN
0-8071-0882-7.
Wilson, Edmund, Patriotic Gore: Studies in the Literature of the
American Civil War, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1962. Reprinted
by W. W. Norton & Co., 1994, ISBN 0-3933-1256-9.
Woodward, C. Vann, "Civil Warriors," New York Review of Books,
vol. 37, no. 17, Nov. 8, 1990.
Notes
^ Liddell Hart,
p. 430
^ See, for
instance, Hirshson pp. 387-388
^ See, for
instance, Walsh, p. 32
^ Sherman,
Memoirs, p. 14
^ Quoted in
Hirshson, p. 13
^ Sherman,
Memoirs, p. 16
^ See, for
instance, Hirshson, p. 21
^ See, for
instance, page on Sherman at the Virtual Museum of San
Francisco and excerpts from Sherman's Memoirs
^ See, for
instance, Hirshson, pp. 362-368, 387
^ Sherman,
Memoirs, pp. 125-129
^ Sherman,
Memoirs, pp. 131-134, 166
^ Quoted in
Royster, pp. 133-134
^ Sherman,
Memoirs, p. 158-160
^ See About
Louisiana State University
^ Quoted in
Hirshson, p. 68
^ Exchange
between W.T Sherman and Prof. David F. Boyd, Dec. 24, 1860.
Quoted in Lewis, p. 138
^ Letter by W.T.
Sherman to Gov. Thomas O. Moore, Jan. 18, 1861. Quoted in
Sherman, Memoirs, p. 156
^ See, for
instance, Hirshson, pp. 90-94
^ Quoted in
Lewis, p. 204
^ Smith, pp,
151-52
^ Eicher, p. 485
^ Daniel, p. 138
^ Quoted in
Walsh, pp. 77-78
^ Eicher, p. 485
^ Smith, p. 212
^ Smith, p. 227
^ Smith, pp.
235-36
^ McPherson, p.
678
^ Brockett, p.
175
^ McPherson, p.
653
^ Telegram by
W.T. Sherman to Gen. U.S. Grant, Oct. 9, 1864, reproduced in
Sherman's Civil War, pp. 731-732
^ Report by Maj.
Gen. W.T. Sherman, Jan. 1, 1865, quoted in Grimsley, p. 200
^ See, for
instance, See Liddell Hart, p. 354
^ Quoted in
McPherson, p. 727
^ See, for
instance, Johnston's Surrender at Bennett Place on Hillsboro
Road
^ See, for
instance, letter by W.T. Sherman to Salmon P. Chase, Jan.
11, 1865, reproduced in Sherman's Civil War, pp. 794-795,
and letter by W.T. Sherman to John Sherman, Aug. 1865,
quoted in Liddell Hart, p. 406
^ Letter to
Chase, cited above
^ "Sherman meets
the colored ministers in Savannah"
^ Special Field
Orders, No. 15, Jan. 16, 1865. See also McPherson, pp.
737-739
^ Liddell Hart,
foreword to the Indiana University Press's edition of
Sherman's Memoirs (1957). Quoted in Wilson, p. 179
^ See, for
instance, Grimsley, pp. 190-204, McPherson, pp. 712-714,
727-729
^ See, for
instance, Grimsley, p. 199
^ Hitchcock, p.
125
^ See, for
instance, Grimsley, pp. 200-202
^ McPherson, pp.
728-729
^ Letter by Maj.
Gen. William T. Sherman, USA, to the Mayor and City Council
of Atlanta, Sept. 12, 1864
^ Wilson, p. 184
^ McNamara and
Blight, p. 130
^ See, for
instance, "Targeting Civilians," by Thomas DiLorenzo
^ Giliomee, p.
253
^ Quoted in
Liddell Hart, p. 402
^ See Isenberg,
pp. 128, 156
^ See, for
instance, Lewis, pp. 597-600
^ Wilson, p. 175
^ From transcript
published in the Ohio State Journal, Aug. 12, 1880,
reproduced in Lewis, p. 637
^ See, for
instance, Woodward
^ See, for
instance, Lewis, p. 652
****
The
above information has been copied in part or in
whole from Wikipedia.org
"The Free Encyclopedia." It may have been modified under
the GNU Free Document License Section 5 in the
following manner: (1) linking; (2) The "[Edit]" text;
(3) the Table of Contents; and
(4) portions may have
not been copied. This article has been licensed
under the terms of the GNU Free Document License.